Who lives, who dies?

If bioethicists like Peter Singer get on a national healthcare commission to determine which healthcare products and services a patient gets based on quality of life, beware. According to the professor at Princeton, parents should have three days after the birth of their child to determine whether the baby should be allowed to live. This is jumping from full term abortion to infanticide, what is next involuntary euthanasia at six months, a year, two years, when does Professor Singer a human being becomes a person? He really does not say. These are the type of people that Sarah Palin is trying to warn about because on Page 30 of the House proposed healthcare bill, it talks about precisely this commission deciding what measures will be used to determine which services and products for healthcare will be provided based on a QALYS, quality assessment of life, and Peter Singer himself said in the New York Times magazine last Sunday, that one teenager's life is worth fourteen 85 year olds. Do you feel your Mom or Dad is safe in the hands of a Hegelian bioethicist like this, well Ezekiel Emmanuel, brother of Rahm Emmanuel, Obama's White House Chief of Staff is mighty cozy with people like Peter Singer and is advising the healthcare taskforce.
Yes, there is cause for worry, make yourselves educated about the House bill talk to your senators and representatives, find out what is making seniors very angry, their fears are justified, because it is not at all settled in this healthcare bill, the value of an 85 or 75 or 65 year old for that matter. So what is the rush, the devil is always in the details, let's hear more of the details, no more rushed through major bills such as the stimulus, and now healthcare, this is insane, and some people have good intentions that will lead to evil consequences for the frail(elderly and newly born).

The new killing fields

The killing is going on in the prisons in Iran after torture to include rape, it is a sad commentary on today's media, that you have to turn to Twitter to get any news on what is happening, CNN, ABC,CBS,NB, Reuters even FOX do not seem to think the torture and killings are newsworthy.

Who wants a NEW WORLD ORDER?

You can call them progressives, liberals, fascists, liberal fascists, progressive fascists, it really does not matter, those who would give up our sovereign rights as a country to the UN or join with the European Union on World Conferences on Reproductive rights and the family, are headed downhill. Many came from Europe and what they left behind were for the most part religious countries. Up until World War II, most Europeans went to church, nowadays European churches resemble Oregon where only 10% go to church regularly. No small wonder Oregon was the first state to legalize volunatry euthanasia.
What will happen if our country becomes Europeanized as Obama and others would like. For one it will become more pagan. Yes that is right, turns out the people who control the Democrat party do not go to church much. Only thirty percent of delegates to Dem convention go to church regularly. Among delegates to Republican convention was eighty percent. You see what the progressives and I use that term loosely, libertines would be a better description for them government is the ultimate authority, the body which can take us to nirvana or utopia. Organized religion gets in the way of their sexual revolution, their quest for population control, rights for homosexuals including marriage. That is why both evangelicals, Mormons and Catholics are demonized by these groups, because they stand as bulwarks against the rising tide of the sexual revolution and all that entails.
Now how did the homosexual and abortion movements get so strong, widespread and fully funded. Because of people like George Soros, but more importantly by non governmental organizations such as the Guttmacher Institute, Planned Parenthood, Lambda(lawyers for homosexual movement). These cabals are well oiled machines, they are progressing toward their goals incrementally, voluntary euthanasia today, involuntary euthanasia thru govenrment healthcare tomorrow. They will accept a loaf of bread a slice at a time, they are realists, pragmatists, not idealists.
In Europe you now have one foreign affairs dept, one structure, defining how big deficits can be for its members, one currency, etc. They have adopted the zeal of the population bomb alarmists, the Rockefeller Institue has done their job for the last fifty years, carrying on a movement started by people like Margaret Sanger who founded Planned Parenthood. Even the ecological movement has been hijacked to educate you that you can reduce the carbon footprint by having less children. Many of them don't like abortion, if they had their way they would just sterilize people like they do in China. Ideas matter, organizations matter, movements that have been around for eighty years matter. As a matter of fact, the patience of the sexual revolution brought by Freudian thought and the population bomb theorists propounded by Ehrlich and others is gaining steam. Even the women's liberation movement which was hijacked by the sexual revolutionists, jumped on the back of the civil rights movement. So in summary some of these movements contained a germ of goodness, but have been corrupted by the sexual revolution population control zealots.
In a CFN interview ith Randy Engel, author talks about the formation of the World League for Sex Reform in 1928, yes eighty years ago. This organization has lobbied and lobbied for contraception, abortion, legitimization of sodomy, population contorl, open marriages, pornography, euthanasia and eventually government owned and supervised brothels.
Dr Richard Day, former medical director of Planned Parenthood-World Population and a Rockefeller protege publicly stated before the riot in Greenwich village in 1969, "homosexuals will be given permission to be homosexual". He gave a historic speech to the Pittsburgh Pediatric Society about a "New World System" on March 20, 1969 the speech was entitled Family Planning: Infant Mortality, Gene Frequency, Abortion and other considerations. He described how the New World System would unfold with sex without reproduction(contraception, sterilization, abortion, homosexuality. He also said abortion will no longer be a crime. The Guttmacher Institue for Population Control, Planned Parenthood and others started decades ago, to eliminate the inferior orders, codespeak for low income undesirables. These are the people that the Rockefellers and other so called enlightened people did not want to support in anyway. They have been very succesful in their object, as despicable as that object is, they were in agreement with the Nazi eugenicist movement, particularly Margaret Sanger. Today, an unborn black child who in their eyes fell into undesirables( along with Mongoloids, retarded children, etc.,) has only a 30 percent chance of being born. They have so inculcated the black community that abortion is somehow compassion, that they are killing themselves. One out of every 4 pregnancies in the US today ends in abortion.
This New World System or Order is being driven by rich people behind the scenes, the face of it is so called "compassion, it is anything but. It is a cold hearted calculation about who is desirable or not, whose life is worth saving or doing away with. Into this vile, toxic mix throw the Hemlock Society which has been very active, they renamed themselves to sound better but voluntary euthanasia in the Netherlands, has now morphed into one third of so called suicides are involuntary. Do we want government healthcare, put together by the crowd that likes eugenics and euthanasia, that promotes abortion, forced sterilization abroad, that wants us to join with other countries to take away rights of parents in favor of the state, who does not have a problem with the One Child policy in China? Think about it, before you give up our private healthcare system to vote for a system that funds abortion and will look at old people in an utilitarian way such as the philosopher Hegel, whom Hitler admired greatly.

ACORN and SEIU thugs and stooges

Turns out some Obama supporters don't like protestors showing up at town hall meetings, they have been told by the White House to hit twice as hard, unfortunately some people took it literally and beat up a black man while hurling racial epithets, he had to go to the emergency room. Turns out it is ok to speak out if you are black and are a liberal, but a conservative, watch out. Whatever happened to civil discourse and debate in this country. Why is it some on the left get vituperative, nasty, personal when discussing public policy issues. It is ridiculous. It is time Congressmen from both parties hear what people think here out in the heartland, because afteer all we can't get heard in Washington over the din of all the special interest lobbyists. Congressmen you better start listening because if you start beleiving your own press releases or the party line, you will find yourself cashiered, that's right, booted out of office, because this time people really are fed up, and if you remember Proposition 13 in California from some years ago, when that happens, they don't lie down or roll over.

Should Nancy Pelosi inspire loyalty?

It appears that Nancy Pelosi is willing to shove conservative Blue Dog Democrats out on a limb in order to do Obama's bidding and get a bill passed before the August recess. She has no skin in the game, as her district did not vote for her as a fiscal conservative. It unfortunately is a loyalty that cuts one way, trying collecting chits when you are no longer in office because you were turned out for following the party line by voting for bills you did not even have time to read. This is like FDR's efforts to pack the Supreme Court, he overreached. Well Pelosi and Obama are overreaching this time, the Senate will not go along, and many conservative Democrats might not either.

The Associated Press

At One time there were two wire services and they competed with each other UPI and the AP. Haven't seen articles by UPI for quite some time. Over time, however have seen the bent of AP articles become more and more predominately liberal, much the same as the network news. The latest article by the AP has such an anti-military slant could not keep quiet any longer.
soldiers in the Fort Carson's 4th brigade of the 4th infantry divsion have been involved in five killings in the last two years. Nowhere in the article does it bother to mention that as the Army found it more and more difficult to recruit while war was going on, started letting ex gang members in the military. This unfortunatley has led to Bloods, Crips and other notorious gangs reforming in the military and their graffiti tags can be found on concrete barriers in Iraq. Some servicemembers have been killed during initiation ceremonies in Germany, off base. We have not had a homicide rate among veterans as high as the general population in the past, however perhaps that is changing. Nowhere in the article is any mention of gangs at all. There have been 121 homicides by veterans in the last four years out of a force of 1.1 million. To put that in perspective, among the population at large, nationally 6 people out of every 100,000 are killed each year, since most are not serial killers, that means out of population of 1.1 million approximately 60 murderers per year or 240 in a four year period. So while the rate is lower, when a unit of 3700 soldiers has five killings in a two year period that is cause for alarm in that unit.
The whole tone of the article is that the average veteran is somehow dangerous to those in the city he lives, this is simply not true. This hyperbole concerning veterans got so bad that an internal memo in the Homeland Security Dept, listed possible terrorists as those who own guns, veterans and prolifers. So I guess as a prolife, veteran who owns a gun, I would be a triple threat. That is plain ludicrous, but it represents the liberal worldview. Post traumatic stress is not good and can be very stressful indeed, but to extrapolate that the 4th Brigade Combat team of the 4th Infantry is somehow an average unit with a homicide rate of 75 homicides per 100,000 people, that is four times as high as the Texas homicide rate of 18, and over twelve times as high as the national rate is scurrilous.

Stimulus or Chicago "machine" politics on a national scale

It appears in spreading around the "stimulus" bill the dollars are going mainly to districts and states that were battleground areas on a higher dollars per capita than states that voted for Obama%, does anyone doubt that this is anything less than the old "spoils" system, the "spoils" are the dollars which will have to be paid back by your children and grandchildren but will be spent in the next 4 years to guarantee the 200 and 2012 elections. This is not stimulate the economy, it is to stimulate you to vote Democrat, period. Florida, Oregon and North Carolina are battling double digit unemployment, but since they are solidly in the tank for the Dems will get little per capita. O n the other hand, states that Obama would like to win next time like North Dakota and South Dakota, will receive large amounts per capita , despite having unemployment rates below the national average. Wyoming which has the lowest 3.9% unemployment rates in teh country will get $1,074 per resident. Nevada where uneployment is 11.3% 167 billion dollars was spread out to the states and they are using it not to start "shovel ready" projects, even though 80% of the people laid off were men. Instead the money is going primarily into apron ready jobs, jobs for women in social work, teaching and healthcare. Unfortunately, those are the areas that had the smallest amount of layoffs. So the stimulus package is going mainly to preserve existing jobs in the auto and government sectors, while the men in construction and manufacturing are left high and dry.
This is as a direct result of a coalition of women's group who went to the Administration, and changed the original "shovel-ready" stimulus bill, to preserving women's jobs. The bill was then put together in the middle of the night and Congressmen were not furnished with copies or time to read it, before they passed it. This is a Pelosi bill all the way, even Harry Reid did not have as much influence in crafting the bill. When the administration disagreed with Nancy Pelosi, Rahm emmanuel bulled her, but in the end, on most things Pelosi and the women's groups held sway.